Comparing Wall Street comp to the NBA

5 responses

  1. Robert Wilson says:

    Look a bit more closely at the Raptors. They are owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan (58%) and I do not believe that the teachers care much about the score of the game as long as fans are filling the seats.

    If the Raptors we’re losing money as well as basketball games it might be a more apt comparison.

    That being said, changing players contracts to give them incentives such as bonuses for winning a certain number of games/winning playoff games is a good idea.

  2. Saul Arias says:

    Did the Raptors or the Knicks get any TARP funds?

    • Mark McQueen says:

      Not TARP Funds, but their hands often aren’t clean if you take all of the NBA teams that play in arenas that are/were subsidized by the funding of local municipal government.

      MRM

  3. Saul Arias says:

    I think we need some perspective here:

    1) Subsidy to the Air Canada Centre: zero or close to zero.

    2) Subsidy to the Madison Square Garden: about $14 million per year, via waived property taxes.

    3) Bailout related to Merrill: $10 billion, plus a $118 billion backstop from the Fed to BoA for losses on assets backed by real estate loans, a big part of them coming from Merrill. Let’s also remember that BoA bought Merrill at a 70% premium.

    If you want to argue that Cuomo should leave Merrill Lynch alone, you’ll have to find an example other than the NBA.

    And that guy who claims he brought in $500 million in revenue? His numbers don’t add up: http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2009/03/04/550-million-in-fees-for-one-merrill-lynch-banker/

  4. Mark McQueen says:

    Saul

    Didn’t want to raise your ire. I know that the ACC was built with private sector funds, althought the Skydome consumed $427 million or so of taxpayer $ in the last century, and the Raptors played there for 4 years if my memory serves me correctly.

    Over all, I was having a bit of fun about the idea that if U.S. legislators are going to legislate / jawbone for pay-for-performance (TARP or not), then the NBA is a candidate as well. I see that Canadian regulators are going to jump into this as well as far as banker CEO pay is concerned, despite the lack of a TARP-like justification in our market.

    MRM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *