Ontario government puts $250M Emerging Technology Fund on ice

5 responses

  1. Alpha says:

    The LSIF market was rightly killed, however, I think that the Flow-Through model would be the most ideal (established market, familarity, etc)

  2. Jim Murphy says:

    Right at the end of a deal with the OETF as we speak. Slow admin and slip ups (their side) ended us up at the next meeting (June) to complete our round.

    Our other (real) investors have been waiting since DECEMBER with cash in escrow behind the OETF to perform its rather odious process. We haven’t been able to access funds for this round until they did their thing.

    Oy.

    • Mark McQueen says:

      Thanks for stopping by.

      I’m sorry to hear that tale of woe. I had thought OETF was keeping up with private sector timelines; that was one of the key elements of the original program design. Is the problem the Ontario Growth Capital Corp. or is an external manager involved on the government’s behalf?

      MRM

  3. Greg Boutin says:

    Do you know how much of the $50M per year were effectively deployed? At the time of the OETF’s creation I questioned it based on the matching criteria (effectively excluding angels) – I’d like to know whether that factored into the limited success of the program. (http://www.growthtimes.com/2009/08/who-will-match-ontario’s-250m-emerging-technologies-matching-fund/)
    MaRS getting continuous funding for a real estate project in the meantime is an aberration, but program funding in Ontario is based on personal politics not proofs of performance, and most entrepreneurs I talk to don’t expect a change in their lifetime. Sad.

  4. Abdallah Al-Hakim says:

    It is a surprising move especially (as article mentioned) there has been a number of new VC funds announced over the past few months. It is very short sighted and comes at a time when Toronto-area startups are start to emerge with such stories as Wattpad and Engagio to name just a few

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *